My first lesson with composer Tania Leon was
something that would change my approach to composition forever. Professor Leon asked me to define a line (actually, she gave me a week to
think about it and return with a definition). I was confused as to
what this could possibly mean aside from a straight line between points A and
B. When I returned for my second lesson, we discussed the various definitions of a
line – particularly in the context of music. To illustrate the endless
possibilities, Professor Leon drew a squiggly line on paper and then asked,
“how would you notate this?” I remember thinking I wasn’t clear on exactly how to represent the shape before me, but soon realized this was an introduction
to the concept of representing sound through notation in a way that expresses
the organic shape of a musical line - beyond approximating the shape via conventional
rhythmic notation, etc. The point of the lesson was to utilize notation in
a manner that expresses the exact, organic shape of the musical idea in your
head. It can mean anything from graphic notation (if this effectively conveys
the idea) as well as micro subdivisions of the beat....but accurately executed! The latter can be a
painstaking process as organically conceived rhythms often look complex when notated
correctly on paper. However, this concept is crucial for pure, unadulterated
compositional thought…especially in an environment where notation software can
make it easy to input the closest sounding conventional rhythm. The concept of
representing a line exactly as it appears forces one to search for the notation
that will communicate that which sounds free and natural….almost in the manner
of an improvisation. In a sense, the concept of “defining a line” deals with
every conceivable musical shape beyond a straight line. As a suggestion, try
singing your organic idea and recording it. Then transcribe the audio exactly
as your hear it without altering the natural rhythm. Notation programs such as Sibelius or Finale make it easy to
select an idea which is “close enough”; however, truly complex rhythms require
all sorts of manipulation and editing (not to mention a firm grasp of math in
terms of note value and subdivisions – especially in the area of nested
triplets / groupings, etc.). This approach will bring you closer to expressing your
original ideas more accurately and also force you to think about what it is you
really want to say as a composer.
I remember back during my wacky weed days, I could see, in my mind, the shapes the notes created, played by someone like Coltrane. And I was convinced he was deliberately creating musical shapes!
ReplyDelete